Plato is not impressed

One of the more interesting discussions I had with my class this week concerned a little quote I pulled from somewhere in Plato’s Republic:

Human affairs aren’t worth taking very seriously.

Detail of The School of Athens by Raffaello Sa...

Detail of The School of Athens by Raffaello Sanzio, 1509, showing Plato (left) and Aristotle (right) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The quote is classic Plato, or at least it is how Plato has classically been characterized. Consider the famous painting by Rafael, “The School of Athens.” Plato stands with Aristotle in the center of the painting. While Aristotle points down to earth, to things like frogs and humans, Plato points up towards the heavens, towards the things that truly matter, the things that do not come and go but ever remain the same. Compared to the permanence of the heavens, to the sun and the stars, or to even more fundamental realities like the True, the Good, and the Beautiful, what is man? An insignificant little blip, a speck of animated dust that tries desperately to stay alive for 80 years or so. For Plato, it was not man, but these higher realities that truly merited our serious attention.

The top news stories lately could be seen as either confirming the truth of Plato’s assessment, or as challenging it. On the one hand we had the spectacle of a former child star, now slightly more grown up, cavorting around a stage in a state of undress and simulating sexual acts with a married man as part of a musical act at an awards show. No, I will not include a picture, you pervs. Besides, the real “story” in this is precisely that it was treated as a story at all. I claim no particular expertise in such matters, but this type of song and “dance” number is far from atypical of the American entertainment industry, which grows ever more shallow and pornographic. Most of what it produces these days is not worth the attention of serious human beings–and this is doubly true in regard to self-congratulatory “awards shows.”ย  We need a little more Plato in our souls in regard to such things.

And, as my students pointed out, it is also a psychologically healthy attitude to have even in regard to one’s own life. It is good to be able to “let things go,” to avoid always being in “desperate haste and desperate enterprises” as Henry David Thoreau once wrote. Realizing that one is not, in fact, the pinnacle of reality often has a nice way of taking away some of one’s self-imposed pressures.

Yet as some of my other students pointed out, Plato’s thought could also operate as an excuse for complacency in the face of great evils. For Miley Cyrus has not been the only news story lately: in America, we just commemorated the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream Speech,” a milestone in the battle against segregation based on skin color. It was only a refusal to shrug and accept the status quo that brought an end to such segregation. But if human affairs were not worth taking very seriously, why would anyone have bothered? Why endure humiliations, beatings, and bombings in the attempt to make a great changes in the human order?

It seems to me, however, that Plato’s wisdom can survive that challenge. I would contend–paradoxically, I know–that one has to endorse some aspects of this Platonic understanding in every struggle for justice. For every struggle for justice is going to involve sacrifice. If human affairs–things like jobs, families, and lives–were the truly most important things, the things to be taken “very seriously,” then struggling for justice would be an inversion of right order. One would be wagering the greater for the sake of lesser, and that is just a bad bet.

But that is not our intuitive sense of things. As much as we long for comfortable lives, we all agree there are situations in which it is right to risk “lives, fortunes, and sacred honor” precisely because there are things higher than human affairs. We may not, ourselves, be courageous enough to actually take such risks, but we remain able to recognize the excellence of those who do.

This entry was posted in Plato and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Plato is not impressed

  1. Hilarious, how Miley Cyrus seems to pop up everywhere…everywhere… I was going to finish reading and was about to prepare a serious comment and make up an opinion…but when you brought her up – and by that time you hadn’t even mentioned her name – I really couldn’t pull myself together, I had to laugh so hard. I go and read blogs that have nothing to do with mind-numbing translation work or vocabulary training…to nourish my intellect…and even on the most promising blogs, all I seem to find is Miley. I’m not complaining, I’m just surprised what an effect such things can have…that they even stop me from reading to ponder over them. The mere fact that I read so much about her, without looking her up in particular, made me ended up writing my own blog post mentioning her, rather than focus on language aqcuisition, as I’d have normally done. I’m thoroughly intrigued by the idea that what she did was so striking that you can simply look at it from all kinds of perspectives and still find ways to get seriously involved. Thanks for that! Very amusing. ๐Ÿ™‚

    • alexanderschimpf says:

      I’m not sure what she did was–in itself–so very striking; I credit her appearance everywhere partly to the power of mass media (a power it is hard to escape), and partly to the happier reason that as humans we are communal even in our thinking. Aristotle says it better than I do: “with others we are more able to think and act.”

      The good news: in a week, nobody will be talking or writing about it anymore!

      Thanks as always for your intelligent comments. ๐Ÿ™‚

      • Thanks for replying to a comment that, as such, I wouldn’t have considered as particularly intelligent, given that I stopped in the middle of something I thought was intelligent, in order to give in to the strong urge share my amusement. Thanks also for sharing Aristotle quote’s on such a regular basis, I’m a huge fan of him and Socrates, though I’m not happy with Aristotle’s view on women. To be fair, I don’t know other philosophers’ views, but I remember Socrates’s wife Xanthippe wasn’t generally praised by him either. I agree that in a week, nobody will be talking about it, though it will surely be as memorable as Madonna and Britney kissing on stage, Janet Jackson showing her tit, etc. and I assume her music will be more present than usual for quite a while. ๐Ÿ™‚ I feel that mass media in Britain has even more of an immediate impact than in Germany, I see it in everyday behaviour, and I’m never quite sure how worried I should be about the media’s power. But I don’t even know from which angle to start thinking about this issue, it demands too much of my brain power…so I’m usually avoiding it.

  2. gotdewy says:

    The other day I had a conversation with my cousin in Viet Nam, and she brought up Miley Cyrus and asked if I had seen the show. Even in Viet Nam they’re talking about Mylie! sheesh!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s